Skip to content

[update_containers] check custom images#3887

Draft
karelyatin wants to merge 1 commit intoopenstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
karelyatin:dnm_custom_images
Draft

[update_containers] check custom images#3887
karelyatin wants to merge 1 commit intoopenstack-k8s-operators:mainfrom
karelyatin:dnm_custom_images

Conversation

@karelyatin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just for testing custom images for services.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign danpawlik for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
@karelyatin karelyatin marked this pull request as draft April 23, 2026 14:05
Just for testing custom images for services.

Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/aa5fe3706c934b33ac8507ebb301d39d

✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 05m 54s
✔️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SUCCESS in 1h 20m 59s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SUCCESS in 1h 26m 09s
✔️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal-minor-update SUCCESS in 1h 53m 43s
✔️ cifmw-pod-zuul-files SUCCESS in 6m 43s
adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph-provider RETRY_LIMIT in 22m 41s
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 8m 52s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 11m 00s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-edpm_prepare SUCCESS in 5m 23s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-update_containers SUCCESS in 5m 12s

karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
karelyatin added a commit to karelyatin/neutron-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2026
It's just for testing different frameworks like
uwsgi, httpd and gunicorn, also old release with eventlet.

Most probably will go with uwsgi same as what being
tested upstream currently, but open to other frameworks
which are being pushed upstream currently.

The strategy in this patch being decided based on the
container image.

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/ci-framework#3887
Related-Issue: #OSPRH-28742
Assisted-By: Claude
Signed-off-by: Yatin Karel <ykarel@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant