Raise in Stream.cycle when enumerable reduce call yields no elements#15344
Merged
josevalim merged 3 commits intoelixir-lang:mainfrom May 6, 2026
Merged
Raise in Stream.cycle when enumerable reduce call yields no elements#15344josevalim merged 3 commits intoelixir-lang:mainfrom
josevalim merged 3 commits intoelixir-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
Member
|
The fix looks correct to me!
Yes, let's also do this! Also, the test can be simpler. You can likely use the process dictionary and no need to use tasks. If it takes too long (because of the loop), the test will timeout anyway, so you can just call Stream.cycle |> Enum.take directly and assert it raises! |
20b7fb8 to
4559989
Compare
d8d03ae to
7f58859
Compare
Member
|
💚 💙 💜 💛 ❤️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR reuses already existing
check_cycle_first_element. I'm opening this as a draft. It fixes the infinite loop but I'm not convinced the approach is correct.Alternatives:
RuntimeErrorinstead ofArgumentError- argument was correct, halting happens later:halteddirectly indo_cycleFixes #15343