Optimise bitwise extraction and insertion#787
Open
lijunbie wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Member
|
That's some truly low effort AI slop |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
insertBits()andgetValueOfBits()using_pdep_u64/_pext_u64on x86-64 builds compiled with__BMI2__.getValueOfBits()calls whose bit indices are not in increasing order.insertBits()andgetValueOfBits()over empty, low-bit, multi-bit, and non-sorted extraction cases.Closes #717
Validation
git diff --check.cmakeis not installed in this environment.