Diffscope advertises "adaptive learning to suppress low-value recurring feedback" and "scoped custom context." That's exactly what evalops platform PRs need — Cursor Bugbot currently reviews there (see `evalops/platform#601`, `#603`, `#613`) and its hit rate is 2-for-3 in the last session (one real bug caught, two false positives).
The evalops org doesn't dogfood its own code-review engine on its own repos today. That's a miss on both sides: diffscope loses the best possible training signal (a busy monorepo with adaptive feedback patterns), and platform PRs don't benefit from diffscope's adaptive-suppression feature that's supposed to reduce noise over time.
Ask
Related context
- Cursor Bugbot's recent false-positive on `evalops/platform#613` (case-glob pattern claim, refuted empirically in the PR thread) — that's the kind of signal adaptive-suppression should learn to quiet
- `evalops/platform#613`'s rank-coverage-check tool is exactly the kind of structural pattern diffscope's custom-context feature could ingest for higher-precision reviews
Scope
~3 days. Install + config + baseline metrics run. The adaptive learning happens after.
Diffscope advertises "adaptive learning to suppress low-value recurring feedback" and "scoped custom context." That's exactly what evalops platform PRs need — Cursor Bugbot currently reviews there (see `evalops/platform#601`, `#603`, `#613`) and its hit rate is 2-for-3 in the last session (one real bug caught, two false positives).
The evalops org doesn't dogfood its own code-review engine on its own repos today. That's a miss on both sides: diffscope loses the best possible training signal (a busy monorepo with adaptive feedback patterns), and platform PRs don't benefit from diffscope's adaptive-suppression feature that's supposed to reduce noise over time.
Ask
Related context
Scope
~3 days. Install + config + baseline metrics run. The adaptive learning happens after.